Feed Your Mind: Get Equal Voice Magazine

Group Calls Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Actions ‘Abusive Authority’

 

PHOENIX (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that the office of America’s self-proclaimed toughest sheriff systematically singled out Latinos in its trademark immigration patrols, marking the first finding by a court that the agency racially profiles people.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Murray Snow in Phoenix backs up years of allegations from Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s critics who say his officers violate the constitutional rights of Latinos in relying on race in their immigration enforcement.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he will appeal a federal judge's ruling that he and his deputies used race to profile Latinos. Immigration groups say he was discriminatory. This truck was seen this year at the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Photo by Equal Voice News
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he will appeal a federal judge's ruling that he and his deputies used race to profile Latinos. Immigration groups say he was discriminatory. This truck was seen this year at the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Photo by Equal Voice News

Snow, whose ruling Friday came more than eight months after a seven-day, non-jury trial, also ruled Arpaio’s deputies unreasonably prolonged the detentions of people who were pulled over.

The ruling marks a thorough repudiation of the immigration patrols that made Arpaio a national political figure, and it represents a victory for those who pushed the lawsuit.

“For too long the sheriff has been victimizing the people he’s meant to serve with his discriminatory policy,” said Cecillia D. Wang, director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Right Project. “Today we’re seeing justice for everyone in the county.”

On Tuesday, residents affiliated with Promise Arizona, a community organization that works on immigration issues, called for public denunciations of Arpaio by city and county government leaders during rallies in Phoenix, group spokesman James Garcia said. Arpaio, he added, is an elected official.

“This is a department that has practiced racial profiling for years. We, as a community, know firsthand the consequences of those practices. The department’s deputies have singled out Latinos at traffic stops and during raids,” he said.

“We’re pleased this sheriff is finally being taken to task by the federal courts. This is a blow against abusive authority.”

Monetary damages weren’t sought in the lawsuit but rather a declaration that Arpaio’s office engages in racial profiling and an order that requires it to make policy changes.

Stanley Young, the lead lawyer who argued the case against Arpaio, said Snow set a hearing for June 14 where he will hear from the two sides on how to make sure the orders in the ruling are carried out.

The sheriff, who has repeatedly denied the allegations, won’t face jail time as a result of Friday’s ruling.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is seen in this Jan. 9, 2013 photo. AP photo by Ross D. Franklin
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is seen in this Jan. 9, 2013 photo. AP photo by Ross D. Franklin

Tim Casey, Arpaio’s lead attorney in the case, said an appeal was planned in the next 30 days.

“In the meantime, we will meet with the court and comply with the letter and spirit of the order,” he said.

On Tuesday, Arpaio released a video to Phoenix news outlets, saying directly that he will appeal the case. In the video, Arpaio said the federal court found that the federal training of sheriff deputies to enforce immigration laws “was unconstitutional and it led to racial profiling.”

A small group of Latinos alleged in their lawsuit that Arpaio’s deputies pulled over some vehicles only to make immigration status checks. The group asked Snow to issue injunctions barring the sheriff’s office from discriminatory policing and the judge ruled that more remedies could be ordered in the future.

The group also accused the sheriff of ordering some immigration patrols not based on reports of crime but rather on letters and emails from Arizonans who complained about people with dark skin congregating in an area or speaking Spanish. The group’s attorneys noted Arpaio sent thank-you notes to some who wrote the complaints.

The sheriff said his deputies only stop people when they think a crime has been committed and that he wasn’t the person who picked the location of the patrols. His lawyers said there was nothing wrong with the thank-you notes.

Young, the group’s lawyer, said he was still reading the decision Friday but noted it contained “very detailed findings of discriminatory intent and effect.”

Immigration from Equal Voice on Vimeo.

Casey said that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) position “is that it has never used race and will never use race in its law-enforcement decisions.” He added the sheriff’s office relied on “bad training” from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

A call to ICE officials in Phoenix for comment wasn’t immediately returned Friday evening.

A U.S. Justice Department lawsuit alleging a pattern of racial profiling is still pending against Arpaio, Garcia said, noting that it remains possible that the federal government could take control of a local police agency should the circumstances dictate it.

Also, Garcia added, the individual plaintiffs in this case could file civil lawsuits against the sheriff’s office and say they were discriminated against and ask for damages.

Arpaio opponents also are working on a recall effort, Garcia said. If enough signatures are collected, he added, a possible recall election could be before voters in September or March 2014. If Arpaio resigns from office, there would be an election for a new sheriff.

Arpaio, who turns 81 next month, was elected in November to his sixth consecutive term as sheriff in Arizona’s most populous county.

Known for jailing inmates in tents and making prisoners wear pink underwear, Arpaio started doing immigration enforcement in 2006 amid Arizona voter frustration with the state’s role as the nation’s busiest illegal entryway.

At this Maricopa County detention facility, Sheriff Joe Arpaio made inmates wear pink clothing, including underwear. Earlier this year, there were tents nearby and inmates standing next to them. Photo by Equal Voice News
At this Maricopa County detention facility, Sheriff Joe Arpaio made inmates wear pink clothing, including underwear. Earlier this year, there were tents nearby and inmates standing next to them. Photo by Equal Voice News

Snow wrote that “in the absence of further facts that would give rise to reasonable suspicion or probable cause that a violation of either federal criminal law or applicable state law is occurring,” Arpaio’s office now is enjoined from enforcing its policy “on checking the immigration status of people detained without state charges, using Hispanic ancestry or race as any factor in making law enforcement decisions pertaining to whether a person is authorized to be in the country, and unconstitutionally lengthening stops.”

Snow added “the evidence introduced at trial establishes that, in the past, the MCSO has aggressively protected its right to engage in immigration and immigration-related enforcement operations even when it had no accurate legal basis for doing so.”

The trial that ended Aug. 2 focused on Latinos who were stopped during both routine traffic patrols and special immigration patrols known as “sweeps.”

During the sweeps, deputies flood an area of a city — in some cases, heavily Latino areas — over several days to seek out traffic violators and arrest other offenders. Immigrants who were in the country without documents accounted for 57 percent of the 1,500 people arrested in the 20 sweeps conducted by his office since January 2008, according to figures provided by Arpaio’s office.

On a street outside the Maricopa County detention facility earlier this year, Sheriff Joe Arpaio kept a military tank. On its side, there was a slogan about fighting drugs, as well as his name. Photo by Equal Voice News
On a street outside the Maricopa County detention facility earlier this year, Sheriff Joe Arpaio kept a military tank. On its side, there was a slogan about fighting drugs, as well as his name. Photo by Equal Voice News

At trial, plaintiffs’ lawyers drew testimony from witnesses who broke down in tears as they described encounters with authorities, saying they were pulled over because they were Hispanic and officers wanted to check their immigration status, not because they had committed an infraction. The sheriff’s attorneys disputed such characterizations, typically working to show that officers had probable cause to stop the drivers based on a traffic violation.

Plaintiffs’ lawyers also presented statistics to show Latinos are more likely to be stopped on days of immigration patrols and showed emails containing offensive jokes about people of Mexican heritage that were circulated among sheriff’s department employees, including a supervisor in Arpaio’s immigrant smuggling squad.

Defense lawyers disputed the statistical findings and said officers who circulated offensive jokes were disciplined. They also denied the complaint letters prompted patrols with a discriminatory motive.

Volunteers from Promise Arizona held a rally in Phoenix on May 28 in opposition of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. A federal judge ruled that Arpaio used race to profile Latinos in immigration and law enforcement actions. Arpaio denies that he used race but has said he will go after "illegals." Photo courtesy of Promise Arizona
Volunteers from Promise Arizona held a rally in Phoenix on May 28 in opposition of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. A federal judge ruled that Arpaio used race to profile Latinos in immigration and law enforcement actions. Arpaio denies that he used race but has said he will go after "illegals." Photo courtesy of Promise Arizona

The ruling used Arpaio’s own words in interviews, news conferences and press releases against him as he trumpeted his efforts in cracking down on immigrants. When it came to making traffic stops, Arpaio said in 2007 that deputies are not bound by state laws in finding a reason to stop immigrants.

“Ours is an operation, whether it’s the state law or the federal, to go after illegals, not the crime first, that they happen to be illegals,” the ruling quoted Arpaio as saying. “My program, my philosophy is a pure program. You go after illegals. I’m not afraid to say that. And you go after them and you lock them up.”

Some immigrant traffic stops were made “purely on the observation of the undercover officers that the vehicles had picked up Hispanic day laborers from sites where Latino day laborers were known to gather,” the ruling said.

The judge also said the sheriff’s office declared on many occasions that racial profiling is strictly prohibited and not tolerated, while witnesses said it was appropriate to consider race as a factor in rounding up immigrants.

“This is a blow to” the sheriff’s office, said David A. Harris, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studied racial profiling and wrote a book on the subject.

Arpaio’s lawyers will have “an uphill climb” in the appeals process because of all “the gross statistical evidence,” he said.

___

Walter Berry of The Associated Press is a co-writer of this article. Equal Voice News contributed to this report. This story was updated on May 29 to include a link to a video statement from Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Related Articles:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.