Feed Your Mind: Get Your Free Magazine


Fate of Immigrant Youth Goes to Congress, as Trump Rescinds DACA

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s administration will “wind down” a program protecting hundreds of thousands of young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children, Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared Tuesday, calling the Obama administration’s program “an unconstitutional exercise of authority.”

The government will stop processing new applications under President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, which has provided nearly 800,000 young immigrants a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the U.S.

But the administration is giving Congress six months to come up with a legislative fix before the government stops renewing permits for people already covered by the program. 

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump leave after attending services on Sept. 3 at St. John’s Church in Washington, D.C. AP Photo by Susan Walsh

“Societies where the rule of law is treasured are societies that tend to flourish and succeed,” Sessions said.

Trump suggested in an earlier tweet that it would be up to Congress to ultimately decide the fate of those now protected by the program. He tweeted, “Congress, get ready to do your job – DACA!”

“Make no mistake, we are going to put the interest of AMERICAN CITIZENS FIRST!” Trump added in a second, retweeted message. “The forgotten men & women will no longer be forgotten.”

Sessions’ announcement came the same day as a deadline set by a group of Republican state officials who said they would challenge DACA in court unless the Trump administration rescinded the program.

Many believe the program would not hold up in court.

Trump’s plan to take a harder line on young immigrants unless Congress intervenes threatens to emphasize deep divisions among Republicans who have long struggled with the issue, with one conservative warning of a potential “civil war” within the party. Congressional Republicans have a long history of being unable to act on immigration because of those divisions.

Immigration rights activists chant slogans on Aug. 8, as they urge Republican lawmakers in Florida to firmly oppose President Donald Trump’s proposals to increase funding for immigration enforcement as deadlines for budget decisions near in Congress. They were in Doral, Florida. AP Photo by Alan Diaz

Trump has spent months wrestling with what to do with DACA, which he slammed during his campaign as illegal “amnesty.” Many of his closest advisers, including Sessions, policy adviser Stephen Miller, and former chief strategist Steve Bannon argue that the program is unconstitutional and have urged Trump to follow through on his campaign promise to end it.

But Trump has repeatedly expressed sympathy for the young people protected by the program, describing the decision as one of the most difficult he’s had to grapple with as president.

“I think the Dreamers are terrific,” Trump said last week, using a term popularized by supporters of the program, which was created in 2012 as a stopgap as the Obama administration pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress.

All the while, his administration has continued to issue new permits and extensions to immigrants who qualify.

But his approach — essentially kicking the can down the road and letting Congress deal with it— is fraught with uncertainty and political perils that amount, according to one vocal opponent, to “Republican suicide.”

Still other Republicans say they are ready to take the issue on.

“If President Trump makes this decision, we will work to find a legislative solution to their dilemma,” said Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham.

The Obama administration created the DACA program in 2012 as a stopgap as it pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress. Many Republicans say they opposed the program on the grounds that it was executive overreach.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and a handful of other Republicans urged Trump last week to hold off on scrapping DACA to give lawmakers time to come up with a legislative fix.

But Congress has repeatedly tried — and failed — to come together on immigration overhaul legislation, and it remains uncertain whether the House would succeed in passing anything on the divisive topic.

One bill addressing the issue that has received the most attention, introduced by Sens. Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., would grant permanent legal status to more than 1 million young people who arrived in the United States before they turned 18, passed security checks and met other criteria, including enrolling in college, joining the military or finding jobs.

It’s unclear, however, whether the president would throw his support behind that or any other existing legislation. He could encourage the writing of a new bill — tied, perhaps, to funding for his promised border wall or other concessions like a reduction in legal immigration levels.

But it’s unclear how much political capital the president would want to put on the line given his base’s strong opposition to illegal immigration, his campaign rhetoric blasting DACA as illegal “amnesty” and his reluctance to campaign hard for other priorities, like health care overhaul.

Trump’s expected move has sparked protests, phone banks, letter-writing campaigns and other efforts across the country urging him not to act.

Obama has kept a low profile since Trump took office, but said during his final press conference as president that he would speak out if Trump threatened “kids who have grown up here and for all practical purposes are American kids, and send them someplace else, when they love this country.”

“They are our kids’ friends and their classmates, and are now entering into community colleges or in some cases serving in our military,” he said, adding that the: “notion that we would just arbitrarily or because of politics punish those kids, when they didn’t do anything wrong themselves, I think would be something that would merit me speaking out.”


Jill Colvin of The Associated Press wrote this report. Associated Press writers Catherine Lucey, Ken Thomas and Erica Werner contributed to it. About the top image: Supporters of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), demonstrate on Sept. 3 on Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House in Washington, D.C. AP Photo by Pablo Martinez Monsivais 

8 Responses to "Fate of Immigrant Youth Goes to Congress, as Trump Rescinds DACA"

  1. Gilbert  October 11, 2017 at 7:06 am

    This issue cannot be left to be decided by the people, as it would be a matter of personal preference and not legal/financial preference. Dreamers are already part of the economy, and to obtain DACA, we have to be enrolled in college and if working at the time, paying taxes because we are issued Social Security numbers. Deporting Dreamers would be literary cutting a chunk off the pie and throwing it in the garbage for a hungry family. The amount of taxes we provide, fees we pay and future taxes/fees we will contribute would be in the billions for this country for a few kids already living and providing to this structure. The requirements to obtain DACA are so strict, if you compared us to the average person our age, our legal records would leave you speechless.

  2. Catherine Howe  September 30, 2017 at 9:41 am

    My fix for the issue, which seems to be the only fair and equal fix, since the immigrants are being given several months to legalize their status in the U.S., would be for our country to vote on the subject. Leave the decision up to the people, "for the people and by the people," correct? Those people in which the government trusted to elect our president, let them decide with a majority vote the future and fate of the Dreamers. Let the people practice their right as a fair country.

  3. Angie n  September 26, 2017 at 7:20 am

    Delores - Getting your citizenship can take a long time. People that apply for it never get it because it takes years. With even more immigrants coming to the U.S., it takes even longer. You just don't get citizenship right away.

  4. REALIST  September 23, 2017 at 4:03 pm

    I agree with Delores, 100%. I have said that I am for better options, better life.

    With this knowledge and drive the parents had, they should have taken the final steps to ensure The American Way, the American Dream for their children and themselves.

    At some point, they knew as the children grew and foundations established, paperwork would be needed for legal status.

    Why is that question not being addressed, instead of feeling sorry for them? Their Dream is slowly becoming a NIGHTMARE WHICH THE PARENTS HAVE CREATED BY NOT LEGALIZING THEIR CHILDREN SHORTLY AFTER THEY ARRIVED HERE.

  5. Alexandra  September 20, 2017 at 8:09 am

    Delores - You should educate yourself prior to making such comments. I am sure that if they had had the opportunity to apply for citizenship, be sure that many of them would have done it. As Leon mentioned above, you have to have a legal status to apply for citizenship. Do you think they enjoy their lives being in the balance right now of not knowing whether they will be able to continue to live in the country they love or if they will be sent back to a country that they don't know anything about? Many of them don't even speak their parents' native language. The USA is a country made of immigrants. The only people who can fully pretend this is THEIR country are the Native Americans. Anyone else was at some point an immigrant!!! Don't be fooled, the Dreamers do not benefit from financial aid when going to college even though many of them pay taxes.

    • Josie  October 8, 2017 at 11:51 am

      Alaxandra, I think you are the one who may need the education! Lol I have to wonder where you live and how many illegals you come across in a day. Of course they are upset and want to be citizens now. They are losing their advantages! There are a certain few who don't know much other than the USA, but the majority I''ve known traveled back and forth on a regular basis! They think this country belongs to them, because they did lose big parts of Mexico in a war, and the USA paid for those land, but they do not accept this. They do not have desire to be US citizens. (Except maybe now that welfare bene's & Social Security payments that they never earned will be cut off. I feel sorry maybe for 10%, the rest need to return to their homeland and work with thier own politicians to make Mexico great!

  6. Leon  September 16, 2017 at 2:34 pm

    In order to become a citizen, you need to have a legal status....This is affecting people who are not legal in this country who came for a better opportunity than what was offered elsewhere. I am a U.S.-Born citizen and think this is something that should be handled delicately, as many of these people who don’t have a legal status are in our military fighting for the freedom YOU have in this country.

  7. Delores  September 13, 2017 at 9:18 am

    They have had enough time to file for citizenship. I do not feel sorry for them at all. When they say that they have been here for many years, they should have applied for citizenship.

    I don't feel sorry for them at all.

    Editor's note: Equal Voice News welcomes comments on stories and thanks readers for taking time to send them. WMAR, the Baltimore affiliate of ABC-TV, reports that DACA recipients are ineligible for citizenship.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.